🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in graves at risk from shoreline retreat say that indecision over how to address the problem is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer sites. Officials say it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents intended this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing looking for treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving overseas. His parent said she lost sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to consider this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some are calling for more sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the options. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.